[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022031827.21e70b2b@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:18:27 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com, efault@....de, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] tracing: Record task flag NEED_RESCHED_LAZY.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:08:41 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> enum trace_flag_type {
> TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_OFF = 0x01,
> TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED = 0x02,
> + TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY = 0x04,
> TRACE_FLAG_HARDIRQ = 0x08,
> TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ = 0x10,
> TRACE_FLAG_PREEMPT_RESCHED = 0x20,
As I stated in the other email, these are user visible. Should probably
make the LAZY flag 0x100, as the trace_flags are 16 bits worth.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists