linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] remoteproc documentation changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875xpiop5y.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:43:37 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>, ohad@...ery.com,
 bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] remoteproc documentation changes

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:

> anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com> writes:
>
>> This patch series transitions the documentation
>> for remoteproc from the staging directory to the
>> mainline kernel. It introduces both kernel and
>> user-space APIs, enhancing the overall documentation
>> quality.
>>
>> V4:
>> Fixed compilation errors and moved documentation to
>> driver-api directory.
>>
>> V3:
>> Seperated out the patches further to make the intention
>> clear for each patch.
>>
>> V2:
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410161444.jOKMsoGS-lkp@intel.com/
>
> So I think you could make better use of kerneldoc comments for a number
> of your APIs and structures - a project for the future.  I can't judge
> the remoteproc aspects of this, but from a documentation mechanics point
> of view, this looks about ready to me.  In the absence of objections
> I'll apply it in the near future.

One other question, actually - what kernel version did you make these
patches against?  It looks like something rather old...?

Thanks,

jon