[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkyq7wJHa77ahJBD5kXhhZB74XazU78aDHtUzgRgFdTrNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:35:24 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>, ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] remoteproc documentation changes
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 07:53, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com> writes:
>
> > This patch series transitions the documentation
> > for remoteproc from the staging directory to the
> > mainline kernel. It introduces both kernel and
> > user-space APIs, enhancing the overall documentation
> > quality.
> >
> > V4:
> > Fixed compilation errors and moved documentation to
> > driver-api directory.
> >
> > V3:
> > Seperated out the patches further to make the intention
> > clear for each patch.
> >
> > V2:
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410161444.jOKMsoGS-lkp@intel.com/
>
> So I think you could make better use of kerneldoc comments for a number
> of your APIs and structures - a project for the future. I can't judge
> the remoteproc aspects of this, but from a documentation mechanics point
> of view, this looks about ready to me. In the absence of objections
> I'll apply it in the near future.
>
Please hold off before applying, I will review the content in the coming days.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists