linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Return early when break handler is found on linked-list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241023164014.GE29251@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:40:15 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: "Liao, Chang" <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
	ptosi@...gle.com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Return early when break handler is found on
 linked-list

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:52:27AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> Kindly ping.
> 
> I'd like to get your input on the next step. Should I send a v2 patch
> that only removes the WARN_ON() as Will suggested? Or should I push
> forward the refactoring of calling BRK hook [1].

If you have the bandwidth to tackle Mark's refactoring idea, then please
feel free to send a series. Otherwise, I'm happy to merge the v2. We
could even do both.

Will