[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ca3fb4b-85d9-493c-8b90-5210f5530e7f@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:25:58 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@...il.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: gla2xxx: use flexible array member at the
end of structures
On 10/23/24 3:17 PM, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
> Fixes: 21038b0900d1b ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix endianness annotations in header files")
The "Fixes:" tag is wrong. The one-element arrays were introduced long
before I fixed the endianness annotations.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
> index 54f0a412226f..ca9304df484b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct qla2300_fw_dump {
> __be16 fpm_b1_reg[64];
> __be16 risc_ram[0xf800];
> __be16 stack_ram[0x1000];
> - __be16 data_ram[1];
> + __be16 data_ram[];
> };
>
How has this patch been tested? Has it even been compile-tested? This
patch probably breaks at least the following statement:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct qla2300_fw_dump) != 136100);
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists