[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <134aa32a-f498-4111-940a-2f79af70878f@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:11:19 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+b390c8062d8387b6272a@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: Fix syscall tracepoint use-after-free
On 2024-10-22 20:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:04:49 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> That's just to say that I don't think that we need any BPF-specific
>>> fix beyond what Mathieu is doing in this patch, so:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Does this mean I can pull this patch as is? I don't usually take RFCs.
It's only compile-tested on my end, so we should at least get a
Tested-by before I feel confident posting this as a non-RFC patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists