linux-kernel - Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2b7d150d-a675-4a35-8f32-75d2da4b3302@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:11:06 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	ksummit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull
 requests

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:19:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> But pushing to linux-next for a day or two, what does that give me?
> 

Two days probably gives you 80% of the testing that people do on linux-next.
I wouldn't run linux-next on real systems but it generally boots and runs LTP
okay these days.

regards,
dan carpenter