[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241023122115.GB28777@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:21:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: core: switch to non_owner variant of
start_freeze/unfreeze queue
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:54:34PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> @@ -4913,7 +4913,7 @@ void nvme_start_freeze(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> set_bit(NVME_CTRL_FROZEN, &ctrl->flags);
> srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&ctrl->srcu);
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
> - blk_freeze_queue_start(ns->queue);
> + blk_freeze_queue_start_non_owner(ns->queue);
Maybe throw in a comment like:
/*
* Will be unfrozen at I/O completion time when called by
* nvme_passthru_start.
*/
so that it's clear why the non_owner version is used here.
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists