[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zxnsmsunc9848hkK@fedora>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:43:38 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: core: switch to non_owner variant of
start_freeze/unfreeze queue
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:00:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:43:24AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > so that it's clear why the non_owner version is used here.
> >
> > There are one more such usage:
> >
> > - freeze in nvme_dev_disable()/apple_nvme_disable() from timeout work, but
> > unfreeze in nvme_reset_work()
>
> Then add it to the comment :)
OK, also nvme_passthru_start() and nvme_passthru_end() are always
paired, so they are actually not non_owner use.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists