[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241024050053.GA30659@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 07:00:53 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: core: switch to non_owner variant of
start_freeze/unfreeze queue
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:43:24AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > so that it's clear why the non_owner version is used here.
>
> There are one more such usage:
>
> - freeze in nvme_dev_disable()/apple_nvme_disable() from timeout work, but
> unfreeze in nvme_reset_work()
Then add it to the comment :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists