[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169b94ae-8711-1821-75a7-7e3a600745e4@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:08:11 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
"yangerkun@...wei.com" <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/6] md/raid1: Handle bio_split() errors
在 2024/10/23 19:21, John Garry 写道:
> On 23/09/2024 07:15, Yu Kuai wrote:
>
> Hi Kuai,
>
>>> iff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>>> index 6c9d24203f39..c561e2d185e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
>>> @@ -1383,6 +1383,10 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev
>>> *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>>> if (max_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
>>> struct bio *split = bio_split(bio, max_sectors,
>>> gfp, &conf->bio_split);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(split)) {
>>> + raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>
>> This way, BLK_STS_IOERR will always be returned, perhaps what you want
>> is to return the error code from bio_split()?
>
> I am not sure on the best way to pass the bio_split() error code to
> bio->bi_status.
>
> I could just have this pattern:
>
> bio->bi_status = errno_to_blk_status(err);
> set_bit(R1BIO_Uptodate, &r1_bio->state);
> raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
>
I can live with this. :)
> Is there a neater way to do this?
Perhaps add a new filed 'status' in r1bio? And initialize it to
BLK_STS_IOERR;
Then replace:
set_bit(R1BIO_Uptodate, &r1_bio->state);
to:
r1_bio->status = BLK_STS_OK;
and change call_bio_endio:
bio->bi_status = r1_bio->status;
finially here:
r1_bio->status = errno_to_blk_status(err);
raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists