[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99fe6e85-aed7-fb30-e0c4-9812667cd0e4@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:37:45 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: <sudeep.holla@....com>, <cristian.marussi@....com>,
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <tstrudel@...gle.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
Johan
Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id
supports fastchannel
On 10/25/24 19:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 03:51:45PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Currently the perf and powercap protocol relies on the protocol domain
>> attributes, which just ensures that one fastchannel per domain, before
>> instantiating fastchannels for all possible message-ids. Fix this by
>> ensuring that each message-id supports fastchannel before initialization.
>
> Again, perhaps you could include the error message I reported here so
> that anyone searching for that error will find this fix more easily?
Ack
>
>> Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZoQjAWse2YxwyRJv@hovoldconsulting.com/
>> Fixes: 6f9ea4dabd2d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Generalize the fast channel support")
>
> And, also again, should you add a CC-stable tag here to get this
> backported?
Ack
-Sibi
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> v3:
>> * Pick up R-b, T-b from the list.
>> * Move scmi_protocol_msg_check to the top [Sudeep]
>
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists