[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxunIcSZDoO3ph64@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:11:45 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
jassisinghbrar@...il.com, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
tstrudel@...gle.com, rafael@...nel.org,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] pmdomain: core: Fix debugfs node creation failure
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 07:36:16PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> On 10/25/24 19:23, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Also seems to do the trick:
> >
> > Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> >
> > But perhaps you could consider starting enumerating the duplicate
> > domains from 2 (or 1) instead of 0?:
> >
> > NCC_1 on 0
> > NCC_0 on 0
> > NCC on 0
>
> We are just trying to make sure node names are unique and
> can't ensure the pd-name correctness since ida starts its
> number generation from 0 and I didn't want to shape the
> fix just to cater to our specific case. The firmware fix
> will be in charge of ensuring pd-name correctness.
Ah, it's a global number space? I didn't really look at the
implementation...
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists