linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/tests: Fix some memory leaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241025-bold-light-vicugna-c30ecf@houat>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:33:13 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, 
	airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, christian.koenig@....com, ray.huang@....com, 
	dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, 
	mcanal@...lia.com, davidgow@...gle.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	karolina.stolarek@...el.com, Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com, 
	thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, asomalap@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/tests: Fix some memory leaks

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:35:59AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/10/18 16:12, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 2024/10/18 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:31:21PM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >>> Fix some memory leaks in drm tests.
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>> - Adjust drm/drm_edid.h header to drm_kunit_helpers.c.
> >>> - Drop the "helper" in the helper name.
> >>> - s/fllowing/following/
> >>> - Add Acked-by.
> >>
> >> This creates build failures since drm_display_mode were const before,
> >> and can't anymore.
> > 
> > It seems it came from bellowing v1, and this v3 has not reported the
> > issue yet.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202410180830.oitxTsOv-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> Hi, Maxime,
> 
> Should this series send again? The issue seems not related to this version.

As far as I know, the issues reported still apply there, so yes

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)