linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm80xx: Use module param to set pcs event log severity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1frokf2ii.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:45:36 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Salomon Dushimirimana <salomondush@...gle.com>
Cc: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>, Jack Wang
 <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen"
 <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bhavesh Jashnani <bjashnani@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm80xx: Use module param to set pcs event log
 severity


Salomon,

> 3 works well for Google, but a different value might be better for
> others. Having a module parameter would allow users to customize the
> level of logging based on their specific needs. If that is not a
> concern, I can change the default to just 3.

How verbose will a value of 3 be during normal operation? I don't object
to capturing more information during failure scenarios as long as we're
not flooding the logs with noise when things are nominal.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering