lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241025100700.3714552-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:06:50 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: <oleg@...hat.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <will@...nel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
	<maz@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<luto@...nel.org>, <kees@...nel.org>, <wad@...omium.org>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<ojeda@...nel.org>, <rppt@...nel.org>, <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	<aquini@...hat.com>, <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
	<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <surenb@...gle.com>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <yangyj.ee@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<mbenes@...e.cz>, <puranjay@...nel.org>, <pcc@...gle.com>,
	<guohanjun@...wei.com>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <prarit@...hat.com>, <liuwei09@...tc.cn>,
	<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
	<ptosi@...gle.com>, <frederic@...nel.org>, <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	<thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>, <joey.gouly@....com>,
	<liuyuntao12@...wei.com>, <leobras@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next v4 09/19] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper

The "READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count = 0" is equivalent
to "preempt_count() == 0 && need_resched()", so use these helpers to
replace it, which will make it more clear when switch to generic entry.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index a3414fb599fa..3ea3ab32d232 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -74,14 +74,6 @@ static inline bool arm64_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void)
 	if (!need_irq_preemption())
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * Note: thread_info::preempt_count includes both thread_info::count
-	 * and thread_info::need_resched, and is not equivalent to
-	 * preempt_count().
-	 */
-	if (READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count) != 0)
-		return false;
-
 	/*
 	 * DAIF.DA are cleared at the start of IRQ/FIQ handling, and when GIC
 	 * priority masking is used the GIC irqchip driver will clear DAIF.IF
@@ -129,8 +121,10 @@ static void noinstr exit_to_kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs,
 			return;
 		}
 
-		if (arm64_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
-			preempt_schedule_irq();
+		if (!preempt_count()) {
+			if (need_resched() && arm64_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
+				preempt_schedule_irq();
+		}
 
 		trace_hardirqs_on();
 	} else {
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ