| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:45:42 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA
to load the firmware
Hi Arnaud,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241026-050443
base: 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025205924.2087768-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_probe':
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:904:21: warning: assignment to 'int' from 'struct rproc_tee *' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
904 | ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
| ^
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:963:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
963 | rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
| ^~~~~
| |
| struct rproc *
In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:21:
include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_remove':
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:986:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
986 | rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
| ^~~~~
| |
| struct rproc *
include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +904 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
874
875 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
876 {
877 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
878 struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
879 struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
880 struct rproc *rproc;
881 unsigned int state;
882 u32 proc_id;
883 int ret;
884
885 ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
886 if (ret)
887 return ret;
888
889 if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
890 /*
891 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
892 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
893 */
894 ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
895 if (ret) {
896 dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
897 return ret;
898 }
899
900 rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
901 if (!rproc)
902 return -ENOMEM;
903
> 904 ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
905 if (ret)
906 return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
907 } else {
908 rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
909 if (!rproc)
910 return -ENOMEM;
911 }
912
913 ddata = rproc->priv;
914
915 rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
916
917 ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
918 if (ret)
919 goto free_rproc;
920
921 ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
922 if (ret)
923 goto free_rproc;
924
925 ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
926 if (ret)
927 goto free_rproc;
928
929 if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
930 rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
931
932 rproc->has_iommu = false;
933 ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
934 if (!ddata->workqueue) {
935 dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
936 ret = -ENOMEM;
937 goto free_resources;
938 }
939
940 platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
941
942 ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
943 if (ret)
944 goto free_wkq;
945
946 ret = rproc_add(rproc);
947 if (ret)
948 goto free_mb;
949
950 return 0;
951
952 free_mb:
953 stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
954 free_wkq:
955 destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
956 free_resources:
957 rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
958 free_rproc:
959 if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
960 dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
961 device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
962 }
963 rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
964
965 return ret;
966 }
967
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists