linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix missing header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241027094853.00ed19cf@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 09:48:53 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, anshulusr@...il.com,
 gustavograzs@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix missing header

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:13:17 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:53:04PM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > Add the linux/regmap.h header since the struct regmap_config is used
> > in this file.
> > 
> > Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Fixes: 1b3bd8592780 ("iio: chemical: Add support for Bosch BME680 sensor")
> > Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h b/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h
> > index b2c547ac8d34..dc9ff477da34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h
> > @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> >  #ifndef BME680_H_
> >  #define BME680_H_
> >  
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> >  #define BME680_REG_CHIP_ID			0xD0
> >  #define   BME680_CHIP_ID_VAL			0x61
> >  #define BME680_REG_SOFT_RESET			0xE0  
> 
> Why is this needed in a stable release?  Does it fix a bug?
> 

Indeed this is just tidying up.  I've applied but dropped the tag and changed
title to Add missing.... as no reason for this to get backported that I know
of.