linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Ceph deadcoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOi1vP8PaYSZCoWHkNFfSQyb2n0qc4pB7iJRrMpJ+9Ck9=UHdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 21:16:08 +0100
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: linux@...blig.org
Cc: xiubli@...hat.com, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Ceph deadcoding

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 3:19 AM <linux@...blig.org> wrote:
>
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
>
> Hi,
>   This series is a set of deadcoding in fs/ceph and net/ceph.
> It's strictly function deletion so should have no change
> in behaviour.
>
> (get_maintainer was suggesting the netdev team as well
> as ceph? Is that correct???)

Hi David,

No, it's not correct.  It's probably caused by

F:    net/

entry in "NETWORKING [GENERAL]" section.  I don't recall
get_maintainer.pl doing that in the past, but I could be wrong.
Anyway, I'll send a patch to exclude net/ceph there.

Thanks,

                Ilya