linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Ceph deadcoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zx6mYTxz0V3LscOW@gallifrey>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 20:45:21 +0000
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Cc: xiubli@...hat.com, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Ceph deadcoding

* Ilya Dryomov (idryomov@...il.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 3:19 AM <linux@...blig.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
> >
> > Hi,
> >   This series is a set of deadcoding in fs/ceph and net/ceph.
> > It's strictly function deletion so should have no change
> > in behaviour.
> >
> > (get_maintainer was suggesting the netdev team as well
> > as ceph? Is that correct???)
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> No, it's not correct.  It's probably caused by
> 
> F:    net/
> 
> entry in "NETWORKING [GENERAL]" section.  I don't recall
> get_maintainer.pl doing that in the past, but I could be wrong.

THanks, I didn't think it was right.

> Anyway, I'll send a patch to exclude net/ceph there.

Thanks, and thanks for applying the cleanup.

Dave

> Thanks,
> 
>                 Ilya
> 
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/