[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abc37c7f-b069-4272-956d-77e099cadf11@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:38:17 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] tpm: Rollback tpm2_load_null()
Dear Jarkko,
Am 28.10.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> On Mon Oct 28, 2024 at 8:13 AM EET, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am 28.10.24 um 06:50 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
>>> Do not continue on tpm2_create_primary() failure in tpm2_load_null().
>>
>> Could you please elaborate, why this is done, that means the motivation
>> for your change?
>
> Which part of "not properly handling a return value" I should explain?
Sorry, where is your quote from?
Anyway, maybe explaining why a successful call to tpm2_create_primary()
is needed to continue would at least help me.
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists