linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86: intel: Add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zx-MLAyyNWiQg-sq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:05:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86: intel: Add 'intel' prefix to the
 modules automatically

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:49:52PM +0100, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically.
> > > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust
> > > against mistypos in the prefix.
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker
> > >
> > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this
> > > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories
> > > in question.
> >
> > Anyone, any comments on this?
> > This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good
> > to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future?
> > Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have
> > tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name.
> 
> I do not like what you are doing here,

That's why the question is to Kbuild if it's possible to have this feature
available treewide for users in a form that you like?

> but it is up to you whatever you do in Makefiles you maintain.

Thanks! Ilpo, what do you think about applying this in its current form?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko