[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <588eb8e1-5035-499f-b19b-8b40a9877433@efficios.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:25:53 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Michael Jeanson
<mjeanson@...icios.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] tracing: Add might_fault() check in
__DO_TRACE() for syscall
On 2024-10-28 16:20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 12:59 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 15:09, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> Catch incorrect use of syscall tracepoints even if no probes are
>>> registered by adding a might_fault() check in __DO_TRACE() when
>>> syscall=1.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> Cc: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>
>>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>>> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
>>> Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>>> Cc: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>>> index 259f0ab4ece6..7bed499b7055 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>>> @@ -226,10 +226,12 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
>>> if (!(cond)) \
>>> return; \
>>> \
>>> - if (syscall) \
>>> + if (syscall) { \
>>> rcu_read_lock_trace(); \
>>> - else \
>>> + might_fault(); \
>>
>> Actually, __DO_TRACE() is not the best place to put this, because it's
>> only executed when the tracepoint is enabled.
>>
>> I'll move this to __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL()
>>
>> #define __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto) \
>> __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), cond, PARAMS(data_proto)) \
>> static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
>> { \
>> might_fault(); \
>> if (static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
>> __DO_TRACE(name, \
>> TP_ARGS(args), \
>> TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \
>> [...]
>>
>> instead in v5.
>
> please drop the RFC tag while at it
I'm still awaiting for Jordan (or someone else) to come back with
testing results before I feel confident dropping the RFC tag.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>> + } else { \
>>> preempt_disable_notrace(); \
>>> + } \
>>> \
>>> __DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args)); \
>>> \
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
>> https://www.efficios.com
>>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists