[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a8e7067-d4ff-40ee-992d-88dbb4bc38ae@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:59:30 +1300
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] x86/virt/tdx: Print TDX module version
On 29/10/2024 11:36 am, Dan Williams wrote:
> Kai Huang wrote:
>> Currently the kernel doesn't print any TDX module version information.
>> In practice such information is useful, especially to the developers.
>>
>> For instance:
>>
>> 1) When something goes wrong around using TDX, the module version is
>> normally the first information the users want to know [1].
>>
>> 2) The users want to quickly know module version to see whether the
>> loaded module is the expected one.
>>
>> Dump TDX module version. The actual dmesg will look like:
>>
>> virt/tdx: module version: 1.5.00.00.0481 (build_date 20230323).
>>
>> And dump right after reading global metadata, so that this information is
>> printed no matter whether module initialization fails or not.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4b3adb59-50ea-419e-ad02-e19e8ca20dee@intel.com/ [1]
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
>
> LGTM, would be nice if the build hash was also included to precisely
> identify the image, but will need to ask for that metadata to be added.
Yes. If that is needed we will need to ask TDX module team to add.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists