linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sophgo: fix pinctrl base-address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3licezlakpgqsvi65i44wbndvt7y3jalbebuxevuz57ctj6ox@aovdt36w7yeg>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:39:09 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, 
	Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, 
	Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sophgo: fix pinctrl base-address

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 07:34:41AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> Hello~, Thomas
> 
> This problem is introduced by this patchset [1], which is still on the
> sophgo/for-next branch and has not been submitted to the main line. So I
> think the right thing to do is to submit another version v6 with your
> bugfix.
> 

It is OK to let this patch go. If we want to keep the patch persisent,
it is better to apply a fix than revoke the fault one and apply a new
version.

Regards,
Inochi