[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90c772ce-6d2d-4a1d-bfec-5a7813be43e4@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:50:46 +0800
From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>, David Woodhouse
<dwmw2@...radead.org>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel
<joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy
<robin.murphy@....com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Kevin Tian
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, Klaus Jensen <its@...elevant.dk>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, Klaus Jensen
<k.jensen@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] iommu/vt-d: Remove the pasid present check in
prq_event_thread
On 2024/10/16 05:08, Joel Granados wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>
>
> PASID is not strictly needed when handling a PRQ event; remove the check
> for the pasid present bit in the request. This change was not included
> in the creation of prq.c to emphasize the change in capability checks
> when handing PRQ events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <joel.granados@...nel.org>
looks like the PRQ draining is missed for the PRI usage. When a pasid
entry is destroyed, it might need to add helper similar to the
intel_drain_pasid_prq() to drain PRQ for the non-pasid usage.
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> index d4f18eb46475..3c50c848893f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> @@ -223,18 +223,12 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
> req = &iommu->prq[head / sizeof(*req)];
> address = (u64)req->addr << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (unlikely(!req->pasid_present)) {
> - pr_err("IOMMU: %s: Page request without PASID\n",
> - iommu->name);
> -bad_req:
> - handle_bad_prq_event(iommu, req, QI_RESP_INVALID);
> - goto prq_advance;
> - }
> -
> if (unlikely(!is_canonical_address(address))) {
> pr_err("IOMMU: %s: Address is not canonical\n",
> iommu->name);
> - goto bad_req;
> +bad_req:
> + handle_bad_prq_event(iommu, req, QI_RESP_INVALID);
> + goto prq_advance;
> }
>
> if (unlikely(req->pm_req && (req->rd_req | req->wr_req))) {
>
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists