[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241028090927.GI9767@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:09:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on_stack()
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 08:29:37AM +0100, Nam Cao wrote:
> There is a newly introduced function hrtimer_setup_on_stack(), which will
> replace hrtimer_init_on_stack(). In addition to what
> hrtimer_init_on_stack() does, this new function also sanity-checks and
> initializes the callback function pointer.
>
> Switch to use the new function.
>
> Patch was created by using Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
> ---
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index d2f096bb274c..631e42802925 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ void play_idle_precise(u64 duration_ns, u64 latency_ns)
> cpuidle_use_deepest_state(latency_ns);
>
> it.done = 0;
> - hrtimer_init_on_stack(&it.timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD);
> - it.timer.function = idle_inject_timer_fn;
> + hrtimer_setup_on_stack(&it.timer, idle_inject_timer_fn, CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD);
WTF is hrtimer_setup_on_stack() ?
Do NOT send partial series. How the hell am I supposed to review things
if I don't even get to see the implementation of things,eh?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists