linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/21] sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871q004i2j.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:50:44 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker
 <frederic@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice
 Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Kees Cook
 <kees@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on_stack()

On Mon, Oct 28 2024 at 10:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 08:29:37AM +0100, Nam Cao wrote:
>> There is a newly introduced function hrtimer_setup_on_stack(), which will
>> replace hrtimer_init_on_stack(). In addition to what
>> hrtimer_init_on_stack() does, this new function also sanity-checks and
>> initializes the callback function pointer.
>> 
>> Switch to use the new function.
>> 
>> Patch was created by using Coccinelle.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
>> ---
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/idle.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> index d2f096bb274c..631e42802925 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
>> @@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ void play_idle_precise(u64 duration_ns, u64 latency_ns)
>>  	cpuidle_use_deepest_state(latency_ns);
>>  
>>  	it.done = 0;
>> -	hrtimer_init_on_stack(&it.timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD);
>> -	it.timer.function = idle_inject_timer_fn;
>> +	hrtimer_setup_on_stack(&it.timer, idle_inject_timer_fn, CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
>> +			       HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD);
>
> WTF is hrtimer_setup_on_stack() ?
>
> Do NOT send partial series. How the hell am I supposed to review things
> if I don't even get to see the implementation of things,eh?

Can you tone down a bit? This was an oversight and I did not notice when
going over it. The full thread is in your LKML inbox, so can you just
move on?

Thanks,

        tglx