[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zx9eVcituFow8PTo@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:50:13 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@...rochip.com>,
Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>,
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/24] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Get rid of enum
kx_chipset
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:05:03 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Instead of using enum, out of which only a couple of values
> > are being actully used, make a comparisons against pointer
> > to the respective chip_info structures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Hmm. Maybe worth a revisit longer term to use callbacks for the
> decisions instead of matching at all as this stuff tends not to end
> up being specific to one version of a chip as more parts are added.
As already mentioned in another reply, yes, the callbacks is the future.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists