[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b340dde-461f-dc6f-217a-c170b913ee63@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:04:14 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Suma Hegde <suma.hegde@....com>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: fix compile-testing without
CONFiG_AMD_NB
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 02:40:00PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > I'm unfortunately left a bit unsure what exactly is your suggestion here,
> > so could you please elaborate?
>
> My suggestion is, I send it to Linus now so it appears in 6.12-rc6 and thus
> the build error is gone in every other tree.
>
> > (I'm assuming the big amd_nb series will go through the x86 tree.)
>
> Yeah, eventually. Not now but see above: if the fix appears in mainline now,
> no problems.
>
> Right?
Yes, I'm fine with you sending it to Linus in this cycle. Thanks.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists