[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR04MB65758032F229BCDBD7CF1216FC4B2@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 05:40:44 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, "Martin K . Petersen"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new clock_scaling lock
> On 10/27/24 1:25 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> > Introduce a new clock gating lock to seriliaze access to the clock
> > scaling members instead of the host_lock.
>
> Same feedback as for the previous patch: please fix the spelling of "seriliaze",
> please use guard() and scoped_guard() where appropriate and please
> reorder the members of struct ufs_clk_scaling.
Done.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists