[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029170533.5592ab42@oak>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:05:33 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Linux Kernel
Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:30:40 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:34:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > The following commit is also in the mm-hotfixes tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 9c70b2a33cd2 ("sched/numa: Fix the potential null pointer dereference in task_numa_work()")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > 82c4d6b6dace ("sched/numa: fix the potential null pointer dereference in task_numa_work()")
> >
> > in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.
>
> Thanks, but... What tip branch is it in? Matters because: is that
> branch destined for 6.12.x?
Its in the sched/urgent branch, so probably destined for Linus fairly
soon. But the tip guys would know better than I.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists