[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h68v2vmy.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 08:52:53 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel
Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree
On Tue, Oct 29 2024 at 17:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:30:40 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is commit
>> >
>> > 82c4d6b6dace ("sched/numa: fix the potential null pointer dereference in task_numa_work()")
>> >
>> > in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.
>>
>> Thanks, but... What tip branch is it in? Matters because: is that
>> branch destined for 6.12.x?
>
> Its in the sched/urgent branch, so probably destined for Linus fairly
> soon. But the tip guys would know better than I.
Yes, .../urgent are fixes for the current -rc cycle. That should go end
of the week to Linus.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists