[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241029110830.GR14555@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:08:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:05:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:30:40 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:34:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > The following commit is also in the mm-hotfixes tree as a different commit
> > > (but the same patch):
> > >
> > > 9c70b2a33cd2 ("sched/numa: Fix the potential null pointer dereference in task_numa_work()")
> > >
> > > This is commit
> > >
> > > 82c4d6b6dace ("sched/numa: fix the potential null pointer dereference in task_numa_work()")
> > >
> > > in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.
> >
> > Thanks, but... What tip branch is it in? Matters because: is that
> > branch destined for 6.12.x?
>
> Its in the sched/urgent branch, so probably destined for Linus fairly
> soon. But the tip guys would know better than I.
Yeah, tip/sched/urgent, which is supposed to go to Linus on Sunday
before he cuts the next -rc or so.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists