[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3f1b608-8549-4846-866e-81f785ee5a59@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:48:30 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>, <ath12k@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor
Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn
Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: ath12k: describe
WSI properties for QCN9274
On 10/30/2024 12:04 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> in the description above you have two different diagrams:
> - one that shows 3 pcie* devices in a single group with apparently one port
> per device
> - one that shows 4 pcie* devices split into two groups of two, again with
> apparently one port per device
>
> but in the representation that follows you describe three pcie* devices, each
> with two distinct ports, all 6 of which are part of group 0.
>
> can we have diagrams that match the actual bindings. does the real product
> actually have 6 ports in one group?
After stepping away and then coming back and reading the dts change I now
understand that each device has two ports, a tx and an rx port.
/jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists