[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61302a71-45d3-4314-b22a-ba51e4c2c49d@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:25:30 +0530
From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Odelu Kukatla
<quic_okukatla@...cinc.com>,
Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] interconnect: qcom: Add EPSS L3 support on SA8775P
On 10/26/2024 9:05 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:30:58PM +0000, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>> Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider support on
>> SA8775P SoCs.
>
> Please describe the reason for your changes. In its current form the
> patch doesn't provide enough details.
>
I will update the commit text in next revision of patch.
> Moreover I don't think it's a correct solution. Using a single ID space
> for an interconnects doesn't really scale. In the longer term we should
> follow CCF approach and switch to using the icc_node pointers when they
> are known.
>
That's correct, We will take it as separate patch series.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists