lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1078ec6-209c-41bb-9a72-ee6e045231b4@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 12:17:25 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>,
 Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Christopher Cordahi <christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement setup_inteface() in the DaVinci NAND
 controller

On 30/10/2024 11:47, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch series aims to implement the setup_interface() operation in
> the DaVinci NAND controller to enable the use of all ONFI modes and
> improve the NAND access speed.
> 

Your changelog is supposed to explain also merging dependencies. Within
patchset or external.

> This NAND controller is present in the DaVinci (OMAP L138) and Keystone2
> SoCs and functions as a 'child' of the AEMIF controller. So its timings
> are set by the AEMIF controller itself from device-tree properties.
> Implementing the setup_interface() callback implies being able to update
> dynamically these timings, so the first two patches of the series modify
> the AEMIF driver to provide its 'children' a way to modify their chip
> select timing configuration. To do so, I add a ti-aemif.h header, I'm not
> sure whether this header should be located in include/memory or in
> include/linux/memory. I put it in include/memory because the folder
> already exists while include/linux/memory doesn't.

All Linux headers go to include/linux/, so this one should as well.



Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ