linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic and semantic tags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyJEBc1qwFHwQQT2@Boquns-Mac-mini.local>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 07:34:45 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
	will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
	dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
	akiyks@...il.com, dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
	urezki@...il.com, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, frederic@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkmm@...ts.linux.dev,
	hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/memory-model: Distinguish between syntactic
 and semantic tags

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:38:26PM +0100, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 10/30/2024 um 12:41 AM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > > Not all tags that are always there syntactically also provide semantic
> > > > membership in the corresponding set. For example, an 'acquire tag on a
> > > 
> > > Maybe:
> > > 
> > > Not all annotated accesses provide the same semantic as their syntactic
> > > tags...
> > > 
> > > ?
> > 
> > Jonas, are you OK with this change?  If so, I can apply it on my next
> > rebase.
> > 
> 
> I'm ok with an extra s after semantics and a minor rephrase:
> 
> Not all annotated accesses provide the semantics their syntactic
> tags would imply
> 
> 
> What do you think @Boqun ?
> 

Yes, of course! This looks good to me.

Regards,
Boqun

> 
>   jonas
>