| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20241031212209.3d94c18c@jic23-huawei>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:22:09 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Cc: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@...nel-space.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno
Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nel.org>, Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/8] iio: dac: adi-axi-dac: extend features
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 07:35:41 +0100
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 21:17 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:13:42 +0100
> > Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 22:45 +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> > > > From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > > >
> > > > Extend AXI-DAC backend with new features required to interface
> > > > to the ad3552r DAC. Mainly, a new compatible string is added to
> > > > support the ad3552r-axi DAC IP, very similar to the generic DAC
> > > > IP but with some customizations to work with the ad3552r.
> > > >
> > > > Then, a series of generic functions has been added to match with
> > > > ad3552r needs. Function names has been kept generic as much as
> > > > possible, to allow re-utilization from other frontend drivers.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi Angelo,
> > >
> > > Small stuff that Jonathan might be able to change while applying... With that:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> > >
> > > > drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c | 256 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > -
> > > > 1 file changed, 242 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > > > index 04193a98616e..155d04ca2315 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
> > > > @@ -46,9 +46,28 @@
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_1_REG 0x0044
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_1_SYNC BIT(0)
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG 0x0048
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SDR_DDR_N BIT(16)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SYMB_8B BIT(14)
> > > > #define ADI_DAC_CNTRL_2_R1_MODE BIT(5)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_UNSIGNED_DATA BIT(4)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_STATUS_1_REG 0x0054
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_STATUS_2_REG 0x0058
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_DRP_STATUS_REG 0x0074
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_DRP_STATUS_DRP_LOCKED BIT(17)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_RD_REG 0x0080
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_REG 0x0084
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_DATA_8 GENMASK(23, 16)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_WR_DATA_16 GENMASK(23, 8)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_UI_STATUS_REG 0x0088
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_UI_STATUS_IF_BUSY BIT(4)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG 0x008C
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS GENMASK(31, 24)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_SYNCED_TRANSFER BIT(2)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM BIT(1)
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA BIT(0)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define
> > > > AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM_ENABLE (AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_TRANSFER_DATA | \
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM)
> > > >
> > > > /* DAC Channel controls */
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_1_REG(c) (0x0400 + (c) * 0x40)
> > > > @@ -63,12 +82,21 @@
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_REG(c) (0x0418 + (c) * 0x40)
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_DATA_SEL GENMASK(3, 0)
> > > >
> > > > +#define AXI_DAC_RD_ADDR(x) (BIT(7) | (x))
> > > > +
> > > > /* 360 degrees in rad */
> > > > #define AXI_DAC_2_PI_MEGA 6283190
> > > >
> > > > enum {
> > > > AXI_DAC_DATA_INTERNAL_TONE,
> > > > AXI_DAC_DATA_DMA = 2,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_DATA_INTERNAL_RAMP_16BIT = 11,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +struct axi_dac_info {
> > > > + unsigned int version;
> > > > + const struct iio_backend_info *backend_info;
> > > > + bool has_dac_clk;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > struct axi_dac_state {
> > > > @@ -79,9 +107,11 @@ struct axi_dac_state {
> > > > * data/variables.
> > > > */
> > > > struct mutex lock;
> > > > + const struct axi_dac_info *info;
> > > > u64 dac_clk;
> > > > u32 reg_config;
> > > > bool int_tone;
> > > > + int dac_clk_rate;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static int axi_dac_enable(struct iio_backend *back)
> > > > @@ -471,6 +501,11 @@ static int axi_dac_data_source_set(struct iio_backend
> > > > *back, unsigned int chan,
> > > > AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_REG(chan),
> > > > AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_DATA_SEL,
> > > > AXI_DAC_DATA_DMA);
> > > > + case IIO_BACKEND_INTERNAL_RAMP_16BIT:
> > > > + return regmap_update_bits(st->regmap,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_REG(chan),
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CHAN_CNTRL_7_DATA_SEL,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_DATA_INTERNAL_RAMP_16BIT);
> > > > default:
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -528,6 +563,154 @@ static int axi_dac_reg_access(struct iio_backend *back,
> > > > unsigned int reg,
> > > > return regmap_write(st->regmap, reg, writeval);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int axi_dac_ddr_enable(struct iio_backend *back)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + return regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SDR_DDR_N);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_ddr_disable(struct iio_backend *back)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + return regmap_set_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_SDR_DDR_N);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_data_stream_enable(struct iio_backend *back)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + return regmap_set_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM_ENABLE);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_data_stream_disable(struct iio_backend *back)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + return regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_STREAM_ENABLE);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_data_transfer_addr(struct iio_backend *back, u32 address)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (address > FIELD_MAX(AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS))
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Sample register address, when the DAC is configured, or stream
> > > > + * start address when the FSM is in stream state.
> > > > + */
> > > > + return regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS,
> > > > + FIELD_PREP(AXI_DAC_CUSTOM_CTRL_ADDRESS,
> > > > + address));
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_data_format_set(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int ch,
> > > > + const struct iio_backend_data_fmt *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct axi_dac_state *st = iio_backend_get_priv(back);
> > > > +
> > > > + switch (data->type) {
> > > > + case IIO_BACKEND_DATA_UNSIGNED:
> > > > + return regmap_clear_bits(st->regmap, AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_REG,
> > > > + AXI_DAC_CNTRL_2_UNSIGNED_DATA);
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int axi_dac_bus_reg_write_locked(struct iio_backend *back, u32 reg,
> > > > + u32 val, size_t data_size)
> > >
> > > nit: this is actually unlocked and needs to be locked from the outside. So,
> > > unlocked could be a better suffix. But more importantly is the extra call to
> > > iio_backend_get_priv(). We can just pass *st directly from the outer function.
> >
> > This naming always gets confusing. Are we naming the state, or what happens?
> >
> > A lockdep marking just inside the function can be used to make it obvious
> > or the old __ prefix to say 'special, check the rules'.
> >
>
>
> Yeah, personally I would prefer the __ prefix...
I've tweaked it to __axi_dac_bus_reg_write() whilst applying.
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists