lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07eef877-622a-4651-8a15-9e507146642c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:10:44 +0100
From: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bluetooth: btbcm: automate node cleanup in
 btbcm_get_board_name()

On 31/10/2024 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/10/2024 16:46, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> Switch to a more robust approach by automating the node release when it
>> goes out of scope, removing the need for explicit calls to
>> of_node_put().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c | 8 ++------
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c
>> index 400c2663d6b0..a1153ada74d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c
>> @@ -541,23 +541,19 @@ static const struct bcm_subver_table bcm_usb_subver_table[] = {
>>  static const char *btbcm_get_board_name(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> -	struct device_node *root;
>> +	struct device_node *root __free(device_node) = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>>  	char *board_type;
>>  	const char *tmp;
>>  
>> -	root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>>  	if (!root)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>> -	if (of_property_read_string_index(root, "compatible", 0, &tmp)) {
>> -		of_node_put(root);
> 
> You just added this. Don't add code which is immediately removed. It's a
> noop or wrong code.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Exactly, I added that code to fix the issue in stable kernels that don't
support the __free() macro, and then I removed it to use a safer
approach from now on.

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ