linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] LSM: Replace context+len with lsm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ+ig=GY1CeVGj1OrsyZtMAMBwst03b-oZ+eC2mLnqjNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:42:30 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, 
	jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, keescook@...omium.org, 
	john.johansen@...onical.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, 
	stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	selinux@...r.kernel.org, mic@...ikod.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	audit@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] LSM: Replace context+len with lsm_context

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:14 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> > On 11/1/2024 12:25 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:58:13PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > >> On 10/31/2024 4:23 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:15:16AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > >>>> Hi Paul,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This patch breaks nf_conntrack_netlink, Casey mentioned that he will
> > >>>> post another series.
> > >> I have a fix, it is pretty simple. How about I send a 6/5 patch for it?
> > > No idea. I don't know what is the status of this series. I would
> > > suggest to repost a new series.
> >
> > I will post v4 shortly. Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Please just post a fix against v2 using lsm/dev as a base.

That should have been "against *v3* using lsm/dev as a base".

Also, since I didn't explicitly mention it, if I don't see a fix by
dinner time tonight (US East Coast), I'll revert this patchset, but
I'd like to avoid that if possible.

Sorry for the screw-up on my end folks, I was trying to get things
done before Halloween kicked off and it looks like I was a bit too
hasty in my review/merging.

-- 
paul-moore.com