lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fd788a9-b051-4c5e-8618-362a8632cb97@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:59:27 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
 linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
 keescook@...omium.org, john.johansen@...onical.com,
 penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org, mic@...ikod.net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, audit@...r.kernel.org,
 netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
 Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] LSM: Replace context+len with lsm_context

On 11/1/2024 9:42 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:14 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/1/2024 12:25 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:58:13PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>>> On 10/31/2024 4:23 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:15:16AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch breaks nf_conntrack_netlink, Casey mentioned that he will
>>>>>>> post another series.
>>>>> I have a fix, it is pretty simple. How about I send a 6/5 patch for it?
>>>> No idea. I don't know what is the status of this series. I would
>>>> suggest to repost a new series.
>>> I will post v4 shortly. Thanks for the feedback.
>> Please just post a fix against v2 using lsm/dev as a base.
> That should have been "against *v3* using lsm/dev as a base".
>
> Also, since I didn't explicitly mention it, if I don't see a fix by
> dinner time tonight (US East Coast), I'll revert this patchset, but
> I'd like to avoid that if possible.

I will have this as quickly as I can. The patch is easy, but the overhead
may slow it down a bit. I should have it in time to avoid the revert.


> Sorry for the screw-up on my end folks, I was trying to get things
> done before Halloween kicked off and it looks like I was a bit too
> hasty in my review/merging.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ