[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241101145439.634f444f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:54:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nir Lichtman <nir@...htman.org>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, Doug Anderson
<dianders@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu
Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 03/11] kdb: Replace the use of simple_strto
with safer kstrto in kdb_main
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:42:28 +0000
Nir Lichtman <nir@...htman.org> wrote:
> I assume that is the reason, I just used the same recipient list that
> the original author of the patch series used a couple of months ago.
> The patch series is mostly around migrating to usage of better string
> to int conversion functions, so technically each change is not really
> dependant on the others.
>
> BTW, Thanks for the reviews Doug and for applying Steven.
Note, it's now in Daniel's court. I dropped the patches from linux-next.
I took Doug's Reviewed-by tags as saying it can go through my tree. But
that was jumping the gun.
Sorry for the confusion.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists