lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173046694894.38539.7909211961224919690.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 13:15:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
 Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, 
 kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regmap: maple: Provide lockdep (sub)class for
 maple tree's internal lock

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:50:12 +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> In some cases when using the maple tree register cache, the lockdep
> validator might complain about invalid deadlocks:
> 
> [7.131886]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> 
> [7.131890]        CPU0                    CPU1
> [7.131893]        ----                    ----
> [7.131896]   lock(&mt->ma_lock);
> [7.131904]                                local_irq_disable();
> [7.131907]                                lock(rockchip_drm_vop2:3114:(&vop2_regmap_config)->lock);
> [7.131916]                                lock(&mt->ma_lock);
> [7.131925]   <Interrupt>
> [7.131928]     lock(rockchip_drm_vop2:3114:(&vop2_regmap_config)->lock);
> [7.131936]
>                 *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: maple: Provide lockdep (sub)class for maple tree's internal lock
      commit: 1ed9b927e7dd8b8cff13052efe212a8ff72ec51d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ