[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173046695082.38539.16119866726852880979.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 13:15:50 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] regmap: maple: Provide lockdep (sub)class for
maple tree's internal lock
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:37:04 +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> In some cases when using the maple tree register cache, the lockdep
> validator might complain about invalid deadlocks:
>
> [7.131886] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
>
> [7.131890] CPU0 CPU1
> [7.131893] ---- ----
> [7.131896] lock(&mt->ma_lock);
> [7.131904] local_irq_disable();
> [7.131907] lock(rockchip_drm_vop2:3114:(&vop2_regmap_config)->lock);
> [7.131916] lock(&mt->ma_lock);
> [7.131925] <Interrupt>
> [7.131928] lock(rockchip_drm_vop2:3114:(&vop2_regmap_config)->lock);
> [7.131936]
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regmap: maple: Provide lockdep (sub)class for maple tree's internal lock
commit: 1ed9b927e7dd8b8cff13052efe212a8ff72ec51d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists