[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87wmhm3u7v.fsf@bloch.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 09:39:32 +0100
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
To: Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com>
Cc: j@...nau.net, marcan@...can.st, sven@...npeter.dev,
alyssa@...enzweig.io, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: apple,spi: Add binding for Apple
SPI controllers
> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 10:36:56 +0800
> Content-Language: en-MW
>
> On 2/11/2024 03:26, Janne Grunau via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> [...]
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - apple,t8103-spi
> > + - apple,t8112-spi
> > + - apple,t6000-spi
> > + - const: apple,spi
> Apple A7-A11 SoCs seems to use a Samsung SPI block, so apple,spi is too
> generic. Fallback to something like apple,t8103-spi instead.
Well, if that is a Samsung SPI block it probably should have a
"generic" compatible that starts with "samsung,". The M1/M2
controllers have a different SPI block (presumably) designed by Apple
themselves. So I think it is (still) appropriate that that one is
"apple,spi".
Also, (upstream) U-Boot already uses the "apple,spi" compatible. So
changing it for purity sake just causes pain.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists