[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce5b3247-c682-47f1-b503-154b5d48bffc@t-8ch.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 04:39:38 +0000
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Peter Jung <admin@...1337.dev>
Cc: jose.fernandez@...ux.dev, Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add resolve_btfids to pacman PKGBUILD
On 2024-11-02 13:05:26+0100, Peter Jung wrote:
> If the config is using DEBUG_INFO_BTF, it is required to,
> package resolve_btfids with.
This sentence sounds weird.
> Compiling dkms modules will fail otherwise.
Maybe we should add it to scripts/package/install-extmod-build so it
also works for all the other package types?
> Add a check, if resolve_btfids is present and then package it, if required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jung <admin@...1337.dev>
> ---
> scripts/package/PKGBUILD | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/package/PKGBUILD b/scripts/package/PKGBUILD
> index f83493838cf9..4010899652b8 100644
> --- a/scripts/package/PKGBUILD
> +++ b/scripts/package/PKGBUILD
> @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ _package-headers() {
> "${srctree}/scripts/package/install-extmod-build" "${builddir}"
> fi
>
> + # required when DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES is enabled
> + if [ -f tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids ]; then
I would prefer to actually test for DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES instead of
file existence. This file may be stale when the option got disabled.
> + install -Dt "$builddir/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids" tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids
> + fi
> +
> echo "Installing System.map and config..."
> mkdir -p "${builddir}"
> cp System.map "${builddir}/System.map"
> --
> 2.47.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists