[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msie955t.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:21:02 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hdanton@...a.com, pabeni@...hat.com, namangulati@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, sdf@...ichev.me, peter@...eblog.net,
m2shafiei@...terloo.ca, bjorn@...osinc.com, hch@...radead.org,
willy@...radead.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, skhawaja@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Linux
Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux BPF <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 7/7] docs: networking: Describe irq suspension
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com> writes:
> Thanks for the feedback. I had been preparing a v6 based on Bagas'
> comments below where you snipped about in the documentation, etc.
>
> Should I continue to prepare a v6? It would only contain
> documentation changes in this patch; I can't really tell if a v6 is
> necessary or not.
Look at the generated docs and be sure that results are what you expect;
the enumerated-list change may be necessary.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists