[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHVXubj8EXCXNPuJ+hqrHwyujjz3GDcqqMjQ4ZFC5VbmZurV3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:09:07 +0100
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on arnd-asm-generic/master]
> [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next tip/locking/core linus/master v6.12-rc6]
> [cannot apply to next-20241101]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandre-Ghiti/riscv-Move-cpufeature-h-macros-into-their-own-header/20241103-230614
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103145153.105097-14-alexghiti%40rivosinc.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
> compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411041609.gxjI2dsw-lkp@intel.com/
>
> includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/ticket_spinlock.h is included more than once.
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/qspinlock.h is included more than once.
Yes but that's in a #ifdef/#elif#else clause so nothing to do here!
>
> vim +10 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
>
> 8
> 9 #define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
> > 10 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> 11 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> 12 #include <asm/jump_label.h>
> 13
> 14 /*
> 15 * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
> 16 * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
> 17 */
> 18 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> 19
> 20 #define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock) \
> 21 static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock) \
> 22 { \
> 23 if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key)) \
> 24 return queued_spin_##op(lock); \
> 25 return ticket_spin_##op(lock); \
> 26 }
> 27
> 28 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 29 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 30 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 31 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 32 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 33 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
> 34
> 35 #elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
> 36
> 37 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> 38
> 39 #else
> 40
> > 41 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> 42
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists