lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZynbhcW864CHhpDL@rli9-mobl>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:47:01 +0800
From: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
CC: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, "Paul
 Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, "Rob
 Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Andrea
 Parri" <parri.andrea@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will
 Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng
	<boqun.feng@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Leonardo Bras
	<leobras@...hat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:09:07AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on arnd-asm-generic/master]
> > [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next tip/locking/core linus/master v6.12-rc6]
> > [cannot apply to next-20241101]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandre-Ghiti/riscv-Move-cpufeature-h-macros-into-their-own-header/20241103-230614
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
> > patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103145153.105097-14-alexghiti%40rivosinc.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
> > compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411041609.gxjI2dsw-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/ticket_spinlock.h is included more than once.
> > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/qspinlock.h is included more than once.
> 
> Yes but that's in a #ifdef/#elif#else clause so nothing to do here!

Thanks for the info, we will fix the bot. Sorry for the false positive report.

> 
> >
> > vim +10 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> >
> >      8
> >      9  #define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
> >   > 10  #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> >     11  #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> >     12  #include <asm/jump_label.h>
> >     13
> >     14  /*
> >     15   * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
> >     16   * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
> >     17   */
> >     18  DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> >     19
> >     20  #define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock)                      \
> >     21  static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock)              \
> >     22  {                                                                       \
> >     23          if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key))                     \
> >     24                  return queued_spin_##op(lock);                          \
> >     25          return ticket_spin_##op(lock);                                  \
> >     26  }
> >     27
> >     28  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> >     29  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> >     30  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> >     31  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> >     32  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
> >     33  SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
> >     34
> >     35  #elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
> >     36
> >     37  #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> >     38
> >     39  #else
> >     40
> >   > 41  #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> >     42
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ